a Tax to Grind®
Subscribe via : RSSSubscribe via RSS Feed | EmailSubscribe via Email

Leaping Lizards! The Assessor’s Office is Outsourcing?

Thursday, 30 September 2010 23:56 by David LeVan

During vacation last week I took the opportunity to go for an early morning swim in the pool. As I was swimming, there was a splash right behind me. When I turned to look I found myself staring at a rather large iguana. It was shocking to see an iguana in the pool (along with the broken branch on which he had previously been sitting while it was still attached to the tree above). Clearly, Mr. Iguana was equally shocked to be there. Turns out that Mr. Iguana could swim. Still, I wasn’t sure if the pool was the right place for him.

Earlier this year Gwinnett County, Georgia outsourced all of the commercial/industrial and business personal property accounts to two private firms. It was part of a larger effort on the part of the county to deal with significant financial strain. The following quote was in the Gwinnett Herald on December 30, 2009: "Today’s reduction in workforce follows the county’s overall plan to gain efficiencies and save money in back office departments that will allow us to focus resources on core mission areas such as public safety," said County Administrator Glenn Stephens. "It’s unfortunate that departments have had to cut positions in order to create these cost savings, but the hard truth is that employees are our largest expense. Like all businesses right now, county government is facing unprecedented economic challenges that have forced us to make difficult decisions about service and staffing levels across the entire organization. However, I am certain that we will emerge from these times a stronger, leaner government."

Understandably, this recession has affected all of us, including local governments! So don’t be surprised if you find that you are not dealing with a county employee on your business personal property return going forward. Will it affect the service level (positively or negatively)?  What does it look like to add a "for-profit" motive to the assessment function?  Will it create a more adversarial environment for taxpayers? Is the assessor’s office the right place for privatization? Or, is it an iguana in the pool?

Is this a good thing, bad thing, or just a thing?  Add a comment and tell me know what you think.  Heck, tell me know about your encounter with an iguana in the pool!

Currently rated 5.0 by 3 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Who's mowing my lawn?

Thursday, 23 September 2010 23:45 by David LeVan

Do I outsource the mowing of my lawn or keep it in-house? For the past several years my son has mowed our lawn and I have been the backup plan. After dropping him off at college a couple weeks ago I realized that some decisions had to be made regarding the future mowing of the yard (the grass was really high when we returned). Truth be told, I actually like to mow. It’s a relaxing diversion from the rest of the week. However, the change in personnel at the LeVan household prompted me to take a deeper look at the outsourcing option.

What are all the costs involved with mowing the yard internally? At first this seems rather elementary… cost of gas, cost of grass disposal, etc. But what about the cost of the equipment, which of course is a John Deere riding mower because we all know nothing rides like a Deere. And what about the upkeep costs for that equipment - the annual maintenance, blade sharpening, etc.? And what about the opportunity costs of using the time (which in this case is about 1.5- 2.0 hours per week) for mowing vs. other things that are important to us (we do like to travel and spend time with family)?

On the flip side, many of our neighbors use a lawn service that from all appearances seems to be very efficient. Their equipment is even more cutting edge than my Deere and they finish a yard with amazing speed and accuracy. Further, they do a really good job of trimming (that’s the part of the job that I don’t like to do). The mowing service seems to have reasonable prices but how does that compare with my own internal costs…… and how do my goals and opportunity costs fit into the picture? It’s probably worthwhile to compare the two options.How often do you compare the two options when it comes to property tax compliance? Have you ever done the comparison? What value might come from looking at the outsourcing option if you are currently doing property tax compliance in-house? What value might come from looking at the in-house option if you are currently outsourcing your property tax compliance? What are the actual costs of each option (including those not so obvious costs)? What are the opportunity costs?

Now that I’m thinking about it, I better start considering who’s going to snow blow my driveway. Chicago winters can be brutal and it’s a really long driveway!

If you need assistance in comparing your compliance options, please send me an email and I’ll be happy to provide you with a comparative cost worksheet that will provide as a good starting point. Hey, the first steps are looking at the costs!

Currently rated 4.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 4.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Watch Out for Cougars!

Thursday, 16 September 2010 23:12 by David LeVan

"Watch out for cougars when you go running tomorrow morning" said a friend after I told him I was going for a run in the foothills east of Los Angeles. I’m pretty sure he was talking about the catlike animal. Anyway, he told me to act big and aggressive if I encountered a cougar during the run. So the whole time I’m fixated on being attacked by the cougar while running in the foothills (and what’s the most effective way to act big and aggressive anyway).

After several miles in the "wild" I came back to the subdivision not far from my hotel and the fear of being attacked by a cougar subsided. As I rounded a corner in the subdivision I saw what I thought was a dog, creeping down the hill in front of me. The dog turned out to be a bear (a very big bear) and with the trajectory of our paths, we ended up directly across the street from one another. Even though I know you’re not supposed to run from a bear, I did (only looking back twice to make sure it wasn’t chasing me). The thought of playing dead crossed my highly distressed mind but, for whatever reason, playing dead on the road didn’t seem safe. During the course of my run I was totally focused on defending myself against the cougar but never contemplated meeting a bear.

It seems to me that the same thing happens in the management of property taxes. Tax departments place tremendous focus on not missing filing dates and payment due dates. In fact, that is how many of them are graded by their companies. This isn’t a bad thing. It’s important to prepare yourself against the potential of meeting up with a cougar, the negative results of missing deadlines. In the PropTax Assessment, 75% of respondents said that they" anticipate and plan for critical due dates" all the time. That’s 75% being prepared in case the cougar encounters.

What about the bear? Let’s call the bear property tax savings left on the table. In the PropTax Assessment, only 25% of respondents said that they "consistently make proactive adjustments" for obsolete assets and only 12% of respondents said that they "consistently and effectively apply the three forms of depreciation" all the time. In fact, in most questions involving ways to appropriately adjust values and save property taxes the responses were alarmingly low. Very similar to my run the focus is on the cougar of deadlines while the bear of missed property tax savings might be creeping just around the corner.

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Life Is Good in LA!

Thursday, 9 September 2010 23:04 by David LeVan

On Sunday I went for a run along Santa Monica Beach.  One sees quite a slice of life on a 10 mile run along the beach.  I saw Jesus (or at least a guy dressed up like him), passed by the Hotel California where you can check out but apparently never leave (I decided to play it safe and not hang around it too long), and a guy with three bulldogs on his motorcycle.  There were lots of families, couples, friends, bikers, runners and walkers just hanging out and enjoying life.  Life is good in LA!

Los Angeles County recently published their overall assessments for 2009 as compared to 2008.  Good news!  The overall valuation of real estate and personal property for the county stayed relatively flat (and by the way, flat in this economy is the new “up”), going from 1.109 trillion (yes, trillion) to 1.108 trillion.  That’s only a 0.09% decrease in values!  And I thought they were struggling with declining values out in California.  I guess values haven’t dropped as much as we thought.  And why confuse that with parallel realities – like for instance the one you might find from other valuation sources.  One such source, Zillow.com, actually shows real estate values declining by 11% in Los Angeles from July 2008 to July 2009.  But…… let’s not go there.  Life is good in LA! 

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I See Dead Depreciation Tables

Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:30 by David LeVan

M. Night Shyamalan wowed us with his breakthrough film, "The Sixth Sense". This may be the only time one of his films has wowed us but I’ll leave that topic for another day. "Sense" rejuvenated the suspense thriller without the gore and violence that is typically used in such flicks. In this intense story, Dr. Malcom Crowe (played by Bruce Willis) is a child psychologist whose new patient, Cole Sear (played by Haley Joel Osment) sees dead people and is constantly terrified by what he sees. The whole movie plays off the reality of Malcolm trying to help Cole with his perception of having these sightings. Reality is flipped upside down in the surprise ending where Malcolm realizes that his "reality" was just a perception - Malcolm is actually dead (sorry if I ruined the ending for you). It was Cole who helped him get to this realization – as he says in the movie, "Dead people only see what they want to see".

I remember watching this film on an airplane. Never in my 20+ years of travel have I encountered so much conversation around an airplane movie than for "The Sixth Sense". Everyone was talking to their neighbors and in the lines for the bathroom. This concept of only seeing what we want to see and letting our perceptions overshadow reality resonates with us. It resonates in the property tax industry as well. In the PropTax™ Assessment results we found property tax managers (with 11+ years experience on average) felt very positive about the following statement, "Our tax team regularly evaluates and uses all applicable depreciation tables, seeking to accelerate depreciation wherever possible". Participants in the PropTax Assessment who labeled themselves as "Individual Contributors" (with 0-2 years experience) felt the opposite, that this was rarely done. This made for an interesting and lively discussion at breakout sessions during the most recent IPT Annual Conference, especially since we agreed that the individual contributors were actually filing most of the returns.

It turns out that the "reality" of the experienced property tax managers is not always what it seems. We discussed several reasons for this but they all seemed to focus on a shortage of time. With the pressure of filing returns on time, evaluation and implementation of accelerated depreciation tables for property taxes is not being done on a regular basis. Accelerating depreciation reduces property tax values which in turn reduces property tax liabilities. One medical leasing company I know of reduced their overall property tax liability $1.3 million in large part by focusing on the lives and appropriate depreciation tables for their assets. How much is your company leaving on the table? Is your perception reality?

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5