a Tax to Grind®
Subscribe via : RSSSubscribe via RSS Feed | EmailSubscribe via Email

A Federal Property Tax?!?

Thursday, 11 March 2010 23:00 by David LeVan

War is hell!  This often repeated statement is thought to have originated in a speech given by General Sherman during the Civil War.  War IS hell, but is it also a time to ponder enacting a Federal property tax?  Well it was in at least two instances.

In 1798 we had an “Undeclared War with France” after they captured hundreds of US merchant vessels.  In an effort to fund the “war” Congress passed a national property tax.  Property was divided into three categories:  houses over $100, land and houses under $100, and slaves.  Assessors in each of the 16 states were authorized to carry out the property tax.  Values were established, taxes were collected and the war ended in 1800 (yes, contrary to what you might think we are no longer at war with France).

In 1943, three economists, commissioned by the Treasury Committee on Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, wrote a proposal to modernize property taxation.  They recommended dozens of reforms to centralize and standardize property assessment at a Federal level.

World War II had changed people’s opinions on taxation.  People, in general, were motivated to contribute to the war effort at all levels.  The Revenue Act of 1942 forced most workers to pay income tax for the first time and still opinion polls consistently showed 85-90% of people thought the new taxes were fair.  Property taxes weren’t quite as popular, though, because they didn’t go directly to the war effort.  This, coupled with overwhelming disagreements in Congress, killed the idea of a Federal property tax.  War is not the best solution.  A Federal property tax probably isn’t either.

 

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Black Friday Just Might Get a Little More Red

Thursday, 17 December 2009 23:00 by David LeVan

Black Friday marks the beginning of the Christmas shopping season. It is estimated that over 135 million people participate in Black Friday. It is not uncommon to see shoppers lined up for hours, even the night before. Not that any of you would do something that crazy. So why call it black then? It is considered the biggest shopping day for many retailers and thus a day that they go from being "in the red" to "in the black"…. You get the idea.

Now it looks like a local jurisdiction is trying to put a little red back into black Friday… the Village of Schaumburg, a suburb of Chicago. Schaumburg is the home of one of the largest malls in the country, Woodfield Mall. Historically, the Village has never imposed a property tax, instead relying on some hefty sales tax revenues (many of which come from sales at Woodfield Mall). However, it seems with the shortfall in retail sales and thus the shortfall in sales tax revenues, they are proposing a new property tax. With this new tax the average homeowner will see an 8% increase in their annual property taxes. For Woodfield Mall this increases their property taxes by about $1.4 million annually. Ouch!

What ever happened to living within your means? Why do all the businesses in Schaumburg have to be creative in working through the recession and the Village can just add a new tax to cover shortfalls? Has the Board considered how this tax increase will affect future economic growth in the community? Have they contemplated the removal of this tax once the economy recovers?

The Village cites increases in health care costs, pension costs and a 64% increase in snow removal costs… snow in the North, go figure. Have costs gone down in any areas? Have they aggressively eliminated all possible expenses - and don’t pull the "public safety" card… I’m talking about the slush funds, the poor choices and the wants that have been redefined to be "needs"? In its efforts to reduce costs, the Village cites a 15.7 percent decrease in its work force but opponents state that the number of Village employees making over $100,000 per year has grown from 30 in 2005 to 110 in 2008. What’s up with that and I mean besides the salaries?

There are a whole lot of questions that need to be considered before turning someone’s Black Friday a little more red!

 

 

Click here to see the video on Schaumburg and their possible property tax.

Currently rated 4.0 by 4 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Sticking it to the Man...

Thursday, 10 December 2009 23:00 by David LeVan

When you think of Abraham Lincoln, do you think first about him being the 16th U.S. president and leading the country during our civil war?  Or is it the emancipation proclamation and freeing the slaves that comes to your mind?  Perhaps what you remember most from history class is his assassination while attending the theatre.  Whatever your associations, I bet your first thoughts did not include, “Wasn’t he a property tax attorney?”

It’s true that Lincoln is remembered for many momentous points in American history.  However, before his presidency he was a practicing Illinois attorney.  Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer in 1833 and joined a general practice, taking on all kinds of cases including property tax appeals.  In many of these property tax appeals he was defending the railroads. 

Lincoln was successful as a lawyer, representing clients against the government.  However, as we all know, he became even more successful by winning the election as President of the United States.  When he became President, his fight against taxes continued.  In office he passed two important laws allowing tax breaks for the railroads.  So I guess in the end, you can stick it to the man or become the man.

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Say Goodbye to the Midnight Buffet

Thursday, 3 December 2009 23:00 by David LeVan

Last week, I had the wonderful opportunity to cruise the Caribbean with my family. The warm sun… beautiful Islands… friendly people… fund excursions… exciting non-stop activities… drink of the day… amazing shows… exotic ocean life… great people watching… All of this was fantastic!

One of the most wonderful parts of cruising is the opportunity to consume more food in a week than you might have otherwise consumed in a month. You can eat constantly… 5, 6, even 7 meals a day. In fact you begin to "need" more meals as the week progresses. I felt the need to try everything on the buffet for breakfast, enjoy lunch in two different restaurants, order 2 main courses for dinner (with dessert – although it was small), squeeze in a quick bite of pizza before the show and grab a couple sandwiches - and a cookie - before bed.

For those of you who have cruised, you know the pinnacle of this eating frenzy is the midnight buffet. On one special night you top off the above described day of eating with a beautiful midnight buffet that would rival any glorious dining experience you’ve ever had. Or… at least they used to have midnight buffets. It seems tough economic times have caused the cruise lines to rethink what we "need" when it comes to eating.

How does this relate to property taxes? Well, I’ll tell you. It seems to me that spending for local government have become like my eating on a cruise ship. The more they spend, the more they "need". Where three meals were needed, now five are needed. This might explain why property taxes have risen every year since the 1930’s to an all time high of $400 billion in 2008. My favorite cruise line eliminated the midnight buffet. When will local governments eliminate theirs?

 

Currently rated 4.8 by 4 people

  • Currently 4.75/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

America's Team, America's Tax...

Thursday, 19 November 2009 23:00 by David LeVan

There seems to be some debate over which NFL team is “America’s Team”.  Both Dallas Cowboy fans and Green Bay Packer fans would lay claim to be fans of “America’s Team”.  I was pondering this while watching the game last Sunday – which, by the way was fantastic.  Why would a team with only 5 world championships (Dallas) even be in the running with a team with 12 world championships (Green Bay)?  The Packers were winning “Superbowls” even before they existed in that form (not to mention the first two actual Superbowls).  And…. who doesn’t like cheese?  Now you might be thinking I am emboldened by the fact that the Packers won last weekend, stunning the red hot Cowboys….. and you would probably be right.

When it comes to taxes in America, I think we could all agree that most of our taxes reflect taxes that we see in other countries. We would probably also agree that we have way too many taxes but I’ll save that for another blog.  Income taxes are common in other parts of the world.  We have sales taxes, others have VAT taxes.  Even with property taxes, many countries have real estate taxes in one form or another.  Yet, if I had to say which tax is “America’s Tax”, it would have to be personal property tax.  I don’t proclaim to be an expert in the taxation policies of every foreign country, but personal property tax is unique to America, almost $100 billion a year-unique.  Annually, thirty-nine states tax personal property and nine tax inventory.  Understanding “America’s Tax” is important if you are doing business in one of those states.  It is particularly important if you are in one of the nine that includes inventory. 

Personal property taxes would be common to both Packer and Cowboy fans, as both states tax personal property.  While we may never agree on “America’s Team” we might actually have a chance in agreeing on “America’s Tax”.  And, by the way, I respect the Cowboy fans who disagree with me on “America’s Team” (as misguided as they may be).

 

Currently rated 4.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5